Uncivil Rights
A BLOG rife with wit, sarcasm, and the endless joy which comes from taunting the socialistic and unpatriotic liberal left. Logical thoughts and musings ONLY need reply...unless you're really, really funny. You have the Uncivil Right to be an IDIOT.
"Give me LIBERTY, or give me DEATH!"
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Taunting Liberals is Addictive
The more liberal blogs I see, the more I need to taunt these people. I really don't understand their complete lack of logic and intelligence in the face of facts and evidence.
I was surfing this evening and found this blog: LEFT is RIGHT (blogging against The Bush War)
The blogger had this preface: "Here is a comment I left at this site, in response to remarks by stereotypical Republicans about why people should be allowed to have their own savings/investments rather than the government "forcing" them to put aside $ for retirement."
Followed by the inevitable incompetence: "A comment was made earlier regarding Social Security and a person's right/need/whatever to have their own savings/investment accounts. Well the problem for the majority of Americans, when they retire, is that they will have no savings/investments. I know this is a hard concept for Republicans to fathom since poor Republicans don't actually exist. But a large portion of our working class makes barely enough take-home pay to meet basic needs of food, clothing and shelter. In fact, this portion has been increasing rapidly since 2000 due to cutbacks in federally-subsidized social programs necessitated by tax cuts to the rich with the consequental reduction in tax revenues, and the increased costs of the military and the pre-emptive invasion of a relatively defenseless nation, among other things. Anyway, since so many Americans are unable to save due to lack of disposable income, the Social Security safety net is the only guaranteed source of livelihood for the elderly.
After 4 years we sane people realize that virtually anything that Bush wants to fix is going to end up in far worse shape than if he just left it alone. If you need proof, we have those newly-failing causes known as: Iraq, the U.S. economy, the environment, education, civil rights and liberties, foreign relations, nuclear proliferation, national security and homelessness, to name just a few. Now, if we can just get Bush and his neocon cronies to keep their greedy hands out of the Social Security till, maybe we can at least save one of our socially-advanced and successful institutions."
Now let's look at the FACTS: The majority of Americans WON'T have savings/investments? Wow, someone that sees the future, maybe that's why libs are so smart. The FACT is the majority af Americans CAN have savings for their retirement, it's called fiscal responsibility, and I believe in the individual when that individual knows they don't have the government to look after them.
How about this: "...a large portion of our working class makes barely enough take-home pay to meet basic needs of food, clothing and shelter." The FACT is they do this with FICA taken out. They can save that money if they had it to invest. Of course, I believe in people. I believe people are smart enough to take care of themselves.
How about this gem: "...since 2000 due to cutbacks in federally-subsidized social programs necessitated by tax cuts to the rich with the consequental reduction in tax revenues,..." Tax cuts to the rich lowered tax REVENUES which therefore reduced ENTITLEMENTS. Usually, less taxes collected from wage earners means the government has less to spend, and since the constitution does NOT call for ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS, they should be the first to be cut. Another FACT, tax cuts were an equal percentage, so mathematically, someone that pays $100,000 in taxes and gets a 10% tax cut, will pay $90,000, compared to someone that pays $10,000 in taxes and gets a 10% cut then pays $9,000. Hmmm, it seems to me the rich guy is paying 10 TIMES THE TAXES AS THE OTHER GUY, YET THE LIBERALS CLAIM IT'S A TAX CUT FOR THE RICH!!! (Liberals always flunked math, finance and economics.)
What about this claim: "Anyway, since so many Americans are unable to save due to lack of disposable income, the Social Security safety net is the only guaranteed source of livelihood for the elderly." The richest group of Americans are over 55 years of age!
And Finally, these pearls of intellectual truth: "we have those newly-failing causes known as: Iraq, the U.S. economy, the environment, education, civil rights and liberties, foreign relations, nuclear proliferation, national security and homelessness, to name just a few." Iraq is a failure? Is that you Ted? PUT THE ALCOHOL DOWN, AND GET OUT OF THE CAR! The economy is a failure? Unemployment at 5.2% and the economy is growing. Where do these people get this stuff? Does Move-on. org have a news site? National Security? I don't believe we've been attacked again IN the U.S. since 9/11, have we? Homelessness? Home ownership is at an all-time high! Although, rent controls (another liberal socialist program) has done major damage to rental units and landlords in general, thereby decreasing rental units in areas that utilize this program. Education? Dems just throw money at it. Schools must be held accountable. Competition will drive performance. Bush wants school vouchers, Dems don't. Blame the libs for bad schools. Foreign relations? Seems that once Iraqis voted, successfully, (Dems didn't think it could happen) and Rice took over for Powell, France and the rest of the Euroweenies want to play nice, hmmm. Nuclear Proliferation? Talk to Clinton and Albright, and they'll tell you how THEY allowed North Korea to build their nuclear weapons program. Again we thank the Dems for that. Name one civil right YOU have had taken away...
Why don't Liberals see the truth? Oh that's right, liberalism is a disease, it make the afflicted think and speak without logic or intelligence.
I was surfing this evening and found this blog: LEFT is RIGHT (blogging against The Bush War)
The blogger had this preface: "Here is a comment I left at this site, in response to remarks by stereotypical Republicans about why people should be allowed to have their own savings/investments rather than the government "forcing" them to put aside $ for retirement."
Followed by the inevitable incompetence: "A comment was made earlier regarding Social Security and a person's right/need/whatever to have their own savings/investment accounts. Well the problem for the majority of Americans, when they retire, is that they will have no savings/investments. I know this is a hard concept for Republicans to fathom since poor Republicans don't actually exist. But a large portion of our working class makes barely enough take-home pay to meet basic needs of food, clothing and shelter. In fact, this portion has been increasing rapidly since 2000 due to cutbacks in federally-subsidized social programs necessitated by tax cuts to the rich with the consequental reduction in tax revenues, and the increased costs of the military and the pre-emptive invasion of a relatively defenseless nation, among other things. Anyway, since so many Americans are unable to save due to lack of disposable income, the Social Security safety net is the only guaranteed source of livelihood for the elderly.
After 4 years we sane people realize that virtually anything that Bush wants to fix is going to end up in far worse shape than if he just left it alone. If you need proof, we have those newly-failing causes known as: Iraq, the U.S. economy, the environment, education, civil rights and liberties, foreign relations, nuclear proliferation, national security and homelessness, to name just a few. Now, if we can just get Bush and his neocon cronies to keep their greedy hands out of the Social Security till, maybe we can at least save one of our socially-advanced and successful institutions."
Now let's look at the FACTS: The majority of Americans WON'T have savings/investments? Wow, someone that sees the future, maybe that's why libs are so smart. The FACT is the majority af Americans CAN have savings for their retirement, it's called fiscal responsibility, and I believe in the individual when that individual knows they don't have the government to look after them.
How about this: "...a large portion of our working class makes barely enough take-home pay to meet basic needs of food, clothing and shelter." The FACT is they do this with FICA taken out. They can save that money if they had it to invest. Of course, I believe in people. I believe people are smart enough to take care of themselves.
How about this gem: "...since 2000 due to cutbacks in federally-subsidized social programs necessitated by tax cuts to the rich with the consequental reduction in tax revenues,..." Tax cuts to the rich lowered tax REVENUES which therefore reduced ENTITLEMENTS. Usually, less taxes collected from wage earners means the government has less to spend, and since the constitution does NOT call for ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS, they should be the first to be cut. Another FACT, tax cuts were an equal percentage, so mathematically, someone that pays $100,000 in taxes and gets a 10% tax cut, will pay $90,000, compared to someone that pays $10,000 in taxes and gets a 10% cut then pays $9,000. Hmmm, it seems to me the rich guy is paying 10 TIMES THE TAXES AS THE OTHER GUY, YET THE LIBERALS CLAIM IT'S A TAX CUT FOR THE RICH!!! (Liberals always flunked math, finance and economics.)
What about this claim: "Anyway, since so many Americans are unable to save due to lack of disposable income, the Social Security safety net is the only guaranteed source of livelihood for the elderly." The richest group of Americans are over 55 years of age!
And Finally, these pearls of intellectual truth: "we have those newly-failing causes known as: Iraq, the U.S. economy, the environment, education, civil rights and liberties, foreign relations, nuclear proliferation, national security and homelessness, to name just a few." Iraq is a failure? Is that you Ted? PUT THE ALCOHOL DOWN, AND GET OUT OF THE CAR! The economy is a failure? Unemployment at 5.2% and the economy is growing. Where do these people get this stuff? Does Move-on. org have a news site? National Security? I don't believe we've been attacked again IN the U.S. since 9/11, have we? Homelessness? Home ownership is at an all-time high! Although, rent controls (another liberal socialist program) has done major damage to rental units and landlords in general, thereby decreasing rental units in areas that utilize this program. Education? Dems just throw money at it. Schools must be held accountable. Competition will drive performance. Bush wants school vouchers, Dems don't. Blame the libs for bad schools. Foreign relations? Seems that once Iraqis voted, successfully, (Dems didn't think it could happen) and Rice took over for Powell, France and the rest of the Euroweenies want to play nice, hmmm. Nuclear Proliferation? Talk to Clinton and Albright, and they'll tell you how THEY allowed North Korea to build their nuclear weapons program. Again we thank the Dems for that. Name one civil right YOU have had taken away...
Why don't Liberals see the truth? Oh that's right, liberalism is a disease, it make the afflicted think and speak without logic or intelligence.
totalkaosdave, 8:54 PM
|
