Uncivil Rights
A BLOG rife with wit, sarcasm, and the endless joy which comes from taunting the socialistic and unpatriotic liberal left. Logical thoughts and musings ONLY need reply...unless you're really, really funny. You have the Uncivil Right to be an IDIOT.
"Give me LIBERTY, or give me DEATH!"
Sunday, January 23, 2005
To the Rest of the World
This is to the Rest of the World:
Elections will take place on January 30, 2005 in Iraq. This is just their first step on their road to democracy and freedom. We should be supporting these elections and the Iraqi people.
However, there are those that do not want the elections to take place. No, I'm not talking about other middle-eastern countries like Iran and Syria (although they are not in favor of them). I am talking strictly about those that hate George Bush and everything he does, and everything he stands for, even to the detriment of these elections, the Iraqi people, democracy, and freedom.
For the Iraq elections to take place on time and by a majority of the Iraqi people (estimates are between 60%-80% of the population) would be considered a victory for George Bush, even though he would be the first to say it is a victory for freedom, democracy, Iraq, and its people.
For example, Jimmy Carter and his ilk can go to Venezuela and endorse a fraudulent election of Hugo Chavez, Richard Geer can "get the vote out" for Palastine, but where are the cheerleaders for Iraq. There will be very few, if any, foreign observers to the Iraqi elections, yet here in America, the blueprint for democratic elections, the far left demanded U.N. observers come in and oversee our election process.
The Iraq election's scenarios are set up and then ignored by the left, so they can then claim the elections are illigitimate. Human rights organizations, who turned a blind eye to the murders and torture by Saddam's regime are touting the complete failure of "free and fair" elections in Iraq.
It doesn't matter to the liberal-socialists if Iraq elections are, in essence, successful; they will never admit it. The liberal-socialists will find some fault with the election to claim them illigitimate. Because if they don't, to admit elections were successful would be to give a victory to George Bush, and that is something they cannot allow. They would much rather have the U.S., the Iraqis, free elections, democracy, and freedom fail than to give credit to George Bush, and for that, they are pathetic.
Elections will take place on January 30, 2005 in Iraq. This is just their first step on their road to democracy and freedom. We should be supporting these elections and the Iraqi people.
However, there are those that do not want the elections to take place. No, I'm not talking about other middle-eastern countries like Iran and Syria (although they are not in favor of them). I am talking strictly about those that hate George Bush and everything he does, and everything he stands for, even to the detriment of these elections, the Iraqi people, democracy, and freedom.
For the Iraq elections to take place on time and by a majority of the Iraqi people (estimates are between 60%-80% of the population) would be considered a victory for George Bush, even though he would be the first to say it is a victory for freedom, democracy, Iraq, and its people.
For example, Jimmy Carter and his ilk can go to Venezuela and endorse a fraudulent election of Hugo Chavez, Richard Geer can "get the vote out" for Palastine, but where are the cheerleaders for Iraq. There will be very few, if any, foreign observers to the Iraqi elections, yet here in America, the blueprint for democratic elections, the far left demanded U.N. observers come in and oversee our election process.
The Iraq election's scenarios are set up and then ignored by the left, so they can then claim the elections are illigitimate. Human rights organizations, who turned a blind eye to the murders and torture by Saddam's regime are touting the complete failure of "free and fair" elections in Iraq.
It doesn't matter to the liberal-socialists if Iraq elections are, in essence, successful; they will never admit it. The liberal-socialists will find some fault with the election to claim them illigitimate. Because if they don't, to admit elections were successful would be to give a victory to George Bush, and that is something they cannot allow. They would much rather have the U.S., the Iraqis, free elections, democracy, and freedom fail than to give credit to George Bush, and for that, they are pathetic.
totalkaosdave, 5:25 PM
|
